January 2026
Pro bike garage ride count
31/01/26 16:58 Filed in: Gear
I've been using Pro Bike Garage as my maintenance record and scheduling app since the Feedback Sports maintenance app was sold to another vendor who decided to take it US-only. PBG has some great features that I really appreciate. This entry is about a specific feature that I only noticed the other day. Ride count. If you tap into a specific bike you can head one level deeper and find a whole screen of data, most of which are greyed out for me as someone who paid for the app but doesn't subscribe for premium. But ride count is there.
It prompted me to go into Strava and unretire my old bikes, just to see how many rides they went on.
The numbers weren't that big, really. Peak is my old Madone nearing 1000 rides.
But my DH bikes hardly get any use at all. The old V10 recorded 39 rides in Strava - I think there were a handful not in Strava as at least at first I had no computer on the bike. The newer Sender is only up to 29. I couldn't believe it at first, but if I get in 10ish visits to Thredbo each season and spend half of them on my Enduro bike and half on my DH bike that's only 5 rides per season. And I don't take it out much (at all!) when I have to push it up the hill. So four seasons and 29 rides is correct.
Where it all started to go wrong for me was when the thought of dollars per ride cropped up. My advice - don't go there. Sure, the old Madone and my Checkpoint are both sitting around $6/ride. The price of a cup of coffee for each ride to get coffee? With so few outings, the two DH bikes don't add up. They're in the territory of premium bike hire at resort prices. Sure I could have had someone else's hire bike and never worried about maintenance, but also never having a choice about tyres, grips, position - anything really. I'll stick with my own bike.
Reminds me that my dad used to like talking about how people could save money by taking taxis instead of buying their own car. And for a lot of people that's probably true. But like hiring a bike, taxis remove a lot of choice and freedom. I notice my dad never opted out of car ownership for a taxi. And I don't plan to opt out of bike ownership for a string of hire bikes.
Two of my retired bikes didn't have nearly enough rides on them for expectations: my old commuter Cannondale only had 100 rides and a couple thousand kilometres - I used it for daily commuting for 14 years (around 7000 rides) and my Superfly XC race bike had barely more than 100 rides on it - I probably rode it 100 times just in races. They are clearly missing out on some Strava data. A quick look at old Strava files shows no bicycle associated with each old ride - I don't know when Strava added that feature but clearly not back in 2012 when I first started using the app (and both of these bikes pre-date that).
It prompted me to go into Strava and unretire my old bikes, just to see how many rides they went on.
The numbers weren't that big, really. Peak is my old Madone nearing 1000 rides.
But my DH bikes hardly get any use at all. The old V10 recorded 39 rides in Strava - I think there were a handful not in Strava as at least at first I had no computer on the bike. The newer Sender is only up to 29. I couldn't believe it at first, but if I get in 10ish visits to Thredbo each season and spend half of them on my Enduro bike and half on my DH bike that's only 5 rides per season. And I don't take it out much (at all!) when I have to push it up the hill. So four seasons and 29 rides is correct.
Where it all started to go wrong for me was when the thought of dollars per ride cropped up. My advice - don't go there. Sure, the old Madone and my Checkpoint are both sitting around $6/ride. The price of a cup of coffee for each ride to get coffee? With so few outings, the two DH bikes don't add up. They're in the territory of premium bike hire at resort prices. Sure I could have had someone else's hire bike and never worried about maintenance, but also never having a choice about tyres, grips, position - anything really. I'll stick with my own bike.
Reminds me that my dad used to like talking about how people could save money by taking taxis instead of buying their own car. And for a lot of people that's probably true. But like hiring a bike, taxis remove a lot of choice and freedom. I notice my dad never opted out of car ownership for a taxi. And I don't plan to opt out of bike ownership for a string of hire bikes.
Two of my retired bikes didn't have nearly enough rides on them for expectations: my old commuter Cannondale only had 100 rides and a couple thousand kilometres - I used it for daily commuting for 14 years (around 7000 rides) and my Superfly XC race bike had barely more than 100 rides on it - I probably rode it 100 times just in races. They are clearly missing out on some Strava data. A quick look at old Strava files shows no bicycle associated with each old ride - I don't know when Strava added that feature but clearly not back in 2012 when I first started using the app (and both of these bikes pre-date that).
Speed & Skill don't develop at the same pace
27/01/26 18:43 Filed in: Riding
I have seen this in early teen riders who get the racing bug. Usually the speed comes a couple of seasons before the skills develop. I won't name names, but several who went on to compete at pro level got their turn of speed around 15 years old, but didn't really learn to control a bike until more like 17 years old. Those were a scary couple of years to be riding beside them. Not quite an unguided missile. Worth mentioning that by 19 all these guys were capable of amazing feats on a bike. Teens learn quickly.
Mostly these days I coach older riders. Some have been riding for decades. Others are quite new to the whole cycling thing. But perhaps neither has experienced a bike at speed. It is tough to learn the skills to handle a bike going fast when you aren't fit enough to make that bike go fast. So the speed really has to come first. I've had some success with descending to obtain speed, I've also seen some crashes where the person thought they were faster than they were. The main problem with learning a skill at 50 or more kmh is the margin for error is smaller. Yes the skills you learn descending will set you up for success in a criterium race at 44 kmh, but you have to survive it first.
The take-away from this is be patient. If you are early in your riding you might want to descend like Tom Pidcock, but he's been at it for 20 years to develop those mad skills.
Mostly these days I coach older riders. Some have been riding for decades. Others are quite new to the whole cycling thing. But perhaps neither has experienced a bike at speed. It is tough to learn the skills to handle a bike going fast when you aren't fit enough to make that bike go fast. So the speed really has to come first. I've had some success with descending to obtain speed, I've also seen some crashes where the person thought they were faster than they were. The main problem with learning a skill at 50 or more kmh is the margin for error is smaller. Yes the skills you learn descending will set you up for success in a criterium race at 44 kmh, but you have to survive it first.
The take-away from this is be patient. If you are early in your riding you might want to descend like Tom Pidcock, but he's been at it for 20 years to develop those mad skills.
Viking's Spring Novice Program (number 26)
14/01/26 21:30 Filed in: Riding
A quick count reveals that last Spring's two novice classes were my 23rd and 24th programs for the Viking's Club. That's a lot. After several years of running 3 classes per year, and then several more years of running 2 classes per year; this year a decision was made to modify things a bit. I admit apprehension at first - why change what works? Except maybe it wasn't working as well as it should. More coaches. More students. One class.
And it is brilliant. Three "head" coaches and three more "assistant" coaches means that individuals can get some one-on-one help while a bunch of up to 30 people can practice proper bunch riding skills. We took them out on the street last week and it turned out there were only 21 persons present - AusCycling limits on road coaching are 7 students per coach. Perfect. Each group had an assistant coach too, so the ratios were actually lower than needed. We took 3 bunches out based on people's experience and did 20 minutes on the road.
I love seeing people who came through the course turning up for racing. I think most of the assistant coaches came through the novice program in past years too.
CCC - my club actually - had a novice program but for whatever reason does not do one currently. That leaves the Viking program as the only game in Canberra if you are interested in getting experienced instruction and practice for bunch riding/race skills. Starting every September - you're too late for this one (it's well over). But there's always next year!
And it is brilliant. Three "head" coaches and three more "assistant" coaches means that individuals can get some one-on-one help while a bunch of up to 30 people can practice proper bunch riding skills. We took them out on the street last week and it turned out there were only 21 persons present - AusCycling limits on road coaching are 7 students per coach. Perfect. Each group had an assistant coach too, so the ratios were actually lower than needed. We took 3 bunches out based on people's experience and did 20 minutes on the road.
I love seeing people who came through the course turning up for racing. I think most of the assistant coaches came through the novice program in past years too.
CCC - my club actually - had a novice program but for whatever reason does not do one currently. That leaves the Viking program as the only game in Canberra if you are interested in getting experienced instruction and practice for bunch riding/race skills. Starting every September - you're too late for this one (it's well over). But there's always next year!